Earlier this year, my friend and former colleague Thor Snilsberg started a new nonprofit organization called CityScience to improve the quality and relevance of science education for urban students. In their words:
CityScience is committed to raising the quality of science education and supporting environmental stewardship. By using the natural and built environments of cities as laboratories for active learning, we transform teaching to make science relevant and engaging for PreK-12 students.
Thor has been working hard all year getting CityScience off the ground, and I'm excited to see it start to gain traction. I'm writing about it today because I just got a really great update & fundraising email from Thor on behalf of CityScience which inspired me to make a donation. That email is the real subject of this post -- I was really blown away by its clarity and sincerity -- as an introduction to the organization and an invitation to become a supporter, I think it's hard to beat. Really nice work, Thor. Pasted below is the email. Read it, and then go make a donation to CityScience.
Dear Family and Friends, Many of you know that 2010 has been an exciting year for me professionally. As the founder and Executive Director of CityScience, I have enjoyed the challenges and complexities of starting a nonprofit to improve the quality of science education in urban school districts. As important people in my life, I am writing to update you on CityScience’s progress and to seek your support. Currently, the United States ranks 24th in international science scores; science is taught less than 3 hours a week in most schools. Because these disparities are even greater in urban areas, CityScience strives to spark students' interest in science while training teachers to make science more hands-on and connected to students' lives. As our mission suggests, cities are natural laboratories for learning and scientific literacy is a key underpinning of our economy and society. To learn more about our unique programs, goals and approach I encourage you to visit www.cityscience.org. Below is a list of CityScience's 2010 milestones. Based on the feedback on our work to date, 2011 will be an exciting year. As family, close friends and existing supporters, I hope this note inspires you to make a tax-deductible donation to CityScience. I look forward to visiting with you in the near future. Best wishes, Thor Snilsberg _____________________________________________ 2010 Milestones Mission & Identity – As you read CityScience's mission to the right, you will begin to see our hands-on approach to improving science education. In developing our logo, we wanted to emphasize how thinking, problem solving and action are life skills learned through scientific inquiry. Recent Programming – In our first major partnership, CityScience provided curriculum for a youth program in the newest National Park. Seeing students develop a passion for geology, forestry, aquatic ecology and architecture was the highlight of the year for me. Our work was recognized by National Parks Service, as being the most "deliberate use of curriculum they have seen," earning us an invitation to present our approach to their educators. 501(c)(3) Incorporation– Thanks to the generosity of two attorneys at the law firm of Skadden Arps, CityScience earned its official nonprofit status June 19th. I have been busy writing grant proposals and introducing the organization to foundations interested in supporting science education, project-based learning and the environment. Board of Directors– Building a board that understands the importance and promise of science education is especially important to me. CityScience is fortunate to have eight board members that all have advanced degrees in science, education, or urban planning. Their expertise and commitment has been essential to helping me tackle countless start-up tasks. In-kind Donations, Corporate Support & Fundraising– The in-kind support of Consider-it-Done Accounting, Durst Organization, New York Lawyers for the Public Interest, and All Star Moving and Storage have defrayed major overhead costs at key points. Our first corporate sponsor, Carpet Cycle, is not only the region's premier carpet recycler, the founder and CEO has become a great friend and mentor. And while I have a lot to learn about fundraising, the list of individual supporters continues to grow. Every donation is like a vote of confidence that brightens my day. Office & Employees– CityScience moved into its first office in October. We are walking distance from Grand Central Station, and I hope all of you have a chance to visit us soon. Our expert instructors and teacher coaches deliver top notch programs and I look forward to continuing to develop our staff and pool of talented contractors. Curriculum & Science Equipment – The curriculum CityScience inherited from the Center for the Urban Environment (CUE) includes fifty subjects and well over two-hundred lesson plans that get students outside to learn science. Developed and time tested for thirty years in New York’s schools, parks and after-school programs, these programs made CUE the largest environmental educator in the five boroughs before it closed in 2009. While it was a capital project that sank CUE, the programs are exemplar and it is an honor to be chosen to carry them on.

I've been reading Steven Johnson's new book, Where Good Ideas Come From: The Natural History of Innovation. It's an enjoyable read, in large part because of Steven's ability to draw connections across seemingly unrelated subject areas to tell a unified story. I'm only about halfway through, but in a nutshell: innovation is a natural phenomenon; the basic patterns are the same whether we're talking about coral reef ecosystems, the human brain, urban systems, or technology development. Each chapter draws from examples across biology, psychology, sociology and technology to tell the story. (This approach isn't new for Johnson - one of his prior books, Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software, tells the story of bottom-up organizing by looking at examples from biology, neurology, urbanism and technology.) There is a chapter in Good Ideas about the "slow hunch": an idea that builds over time, in pieces, often without the explicit awareness of the builder. Part of what makes a slow hunch possible is the cataloging of notes and observations over time, and the ability to look back and draw associations. Many prominent thinkers (Locke, Darwin), accomplished this by keeping a "commonplace book" -- a journal of quotes, observations, sketches, and half-baked ideas -- that they would review regularly. According to Johnson, as important as writing down the notes is re-reading them, in order to make connections that you otherwise might miss:
"Each rereading of the commonplace book becomes a new kind of revelation. You see the evolutionary paths of all your past hunches: the ones that turned out to be red herrings; the ones that turned out to be too obvious to write; even the ones that turned into entire books. But each encounter holds the promise that some long-forgotten hunch will connect in a new way with some emerging obsession."
Later, Johnson talks about his own digital commonplace book, a tool called DEVONthink:
"I keep all these quotes in a database using a program called DEVONthink, where I also store my own writing: chapters, essays, blog posts, notes. By combining my own words with passages from other sources, the collection becomes something more than just a files storage system. It becomes a digital extension of my imperfect memory, an archive of all my old ideas, and the ideas that have influenced me. There are now more than five thousand distinct entries in that database, and more than 3 million words -- sixty books' worth of quotes, fragments, and hunches, all individually captured by me, stored in a single database. Having all that information available at my fingertips is not just a quantitative matter of finding my notes faster. Yes, when I'm trying to track down an article I wrote many years ago, it's now much easier to retrieve. But the qualitative change lies elsewhere: in finding documents that I've forgotten about altogether, finding documents that I didn't know I was looking for. What makes the system truly powerful is the way it fosters private serendipity."
Steven's writing is an example of this in action -- it seems clear now that this system helps him make connections he might have otherwise missed. For example:
"This can create almost lyrical connections between ideas. Several years ago, I was working on a book about cholera in London and queried DEVONthink for information about Victorian sewage systems. Because the software had detected that the word "waste" is often used alongside "sewage," it directed me to a quote that explained the way bones evolved in vertebrate bodies: namely, by repurposing the calcum waste products created by the metabolism of cells. At first glance that might seems like an errant result, but it sent me off on a long and fruitful tangent into the way complex systems -- whether cities or bodies -- find productive uses for the waste they create. That idea became a central organizing theme for one of the chapters in the cholera book."
So: it appears that re-reading your old notes, and ideally doing so with some amount of fuzz and randomization, can lead to the development of new ideas. I like it. I certainly spend a lot of time capturing notes, but my process for reviewing them is scattershot: I'll read back through old tweets & tumbls, occasionally search through my delicious bookmarks (though not that often), and sometimes scan an old notebook, but I don't have a good way of tying it all together. But, unlike Steven, I don't keep all of my notes in a single database. I use the web, and my notes are everywhere -- in blog posts I've written, tweets I've sent, bookmarks I've tagged, comments I've left, and (increasingly) in my Tumblog. I do it this way because there is value in building these ideas together with others -- I want people to read my tweets, tumbls, blog posts, and bookmarks, and connect them with their own. I could just as easily keep all of these tidbits locked up on my computer, but I believe that there's more value in opening them up. So, tools like DEVONthink (and Evernote), that assume you are using their system in isolation, aren't much help for me. I do keep private notes, but those aren't in a single system either -- they're scattered across the internet and my computer. I have hundreds of notes in Notational Velocity (a SimpleNote client for Mac -- before that I used Yojimbo for the same purpose), and I keep a journal in the form of a private wordpress blog (which serves the same purpose as OhLife would), and I have other notes in google docs and etherpads. So, what I want is a tool that helps me review across all of these sources, brings them together in a nice way, makes searching easy, and allows for some amount of fuzziness and random discovery. Basically an "open" commonplace book that understands my distributed landscape of knowledge bits. A commonplace book that works like the web. My ideal version of this tool would run locally on my computer, mostly so that it could access local files, and also for speed. The idea is something like this:

I could imagine an advanced searching interface, but for day-to-day, I'd really just want something simple and fast that integrates into my workflow (the way that Quicksilver does) without feeling like a big heavy app. There are certainly neighboring precedents in this general area of tools that organize my web-based presence. Some of my favorites are TripIt (on the left, below) which takes my travel info and repackages it in a way that's useful to me, and Momento (on the right), which takes a a bag of feeds and turns it into a nice timeline view:
Momento is maybe the closest to what I'm talking about, in that it understands that my experience is distributed, and that it's value is tying it together for me. It's serving a different purpose than the one I'm talking about, but it is in the right family. I could easily see Evernote moving in this direction, and I would be psyched if they did, but I think it would be a lighter lift to just start with simple aggregating and searching, and not worry about all of the content capture that Evernote handles. So, that's the idea. After all this, I would be pleasantly surprised to see that this already exists, but if I does, I haven't seen it yet.

I'd like to make an addition to my internet wish list for 2011: a Strategic Networking Tool. Here's what I mean: Online networks of all kinds are very good at telling you who you're already connected with. Who your friends are, who your professional contacts are, etc. This is great, but it's all looking in the rear-view mirror. What they are not yet that good for is looking forward -- helping me figure out who I should be connected with. Now, I can hear you saying "what about Twitter and Facebook's 'recommended friend' features?" Fair enough. Recently, both networks have started approaching this problem. Facebook suggests people you might be friends with; Twitter shows you related potential follows and people you are similar to.

Earlier this year, my friend and former colleague Thor Snilsberg started a new nonprofit organization called CityScience to improve the quality and relevance of science education for urban students. In their words:
CityScience is committed to raising the quality of science education and supporting environmental stewardship. By using the natural and built environments of cities as laboratories for active learning, we transform teaching to make science relevant and engaging for PreK-12 students.
Thor has been working hard all year getting CityScience off the ground, and I'm excited to see it start to gain traction. I'm writing about it today because I just got a really great update & fundraising email from Thor on behalf of CityScience which inspired me to make a donation. That email is the real subject of this post -- I was really blown away by its clarity and sincerity -- as an introduction to the organization and an invitation to become a supporter, I think it's hard to beat. Really nice work, Thor. Pasted below is the email. Read it, and then go make a donation to CityScience.
Dear Family and Friends, Many of you know that 2010 has been an exciting year for me professionally. As the founder and Executive Director of CityScience, I have enjoyed the challenges and complexities of starting a nonprofit to improve the quality of science education in urban school districts. As important people in my life, I am writing to update you on CityScience’s progress and to seek your support. Currently, the United States ranks 24th in international science scores; science is taught less than 3 hours a week in most schools. Because these disparities are even greater in urban areas, CityScience strives to spark students' interest in science while training teachers to make science more hands-on and connected to students' lives. As our mission suggests, cities are natural laboratories for learning and scientific literacy is a key underpinning of our economy and society. To learn more about our unique programs, goals and approach I encourage you to visit www.cityscience.org. Below is a list of CityScience's 2010 milestones. Based on the feedback on our work to date, 2011 will be an exciting year. As family, close friends and existing supporters, I hope this note inspires you to make a tax-deductible donation to CityScience. I look forward to visiting with you in the near future. Best wishes, Thor Snilsberg _____________________________________________ 2010 Milestones Mission & Identity – As you read CityScience's mission to the right, you will begin to see our hands-on approach to improving science education. In developing our logo, we wanted to emphasize how thinking, problem solving and action are life skills learned through scientific inquiry. Recent Programming – In our first major partnership, CityScience provided curriculum for a youth program in the newest National Park. Seeing students develop a passion for geology, forestry, aquatic ecology and architecture was the highlight of the year for me. Our work was recognized by National Parks Service, as being the most "deliberate use of curriculum they have seen," earning us an invitation to present our approach to their educators. 501(c)(3) Incorporation– Thanks to the generosity of two attorneys at the law firm of Skadden Arps, CityScience earned its official nonprofit status June 19th. I have been busy writing grant proposals and introducing the organization to foundations interested in supporting science education, project-based learning and the environment. Board of Directors– Building a board that understands the importance and promise of science education is especially important to me. CityScience is fortunate to have eight board members that all have advanced degrees in science, education, or urban planning. Their expertise and commitment has been essential to helping me tackle countless start-up tasks. In-kind Donations, Corporate Support & Fundraising– The in-kind support of Consider-it-Done Accounting, Durst Organization, New York Lawyers for the Public Interest, and All Star Moving and Storage have defrayed major overhead costs at key points. Our first corporate sponsor, Carpet Cycle, is not only the region's premier carpet recycler, the founder and CEO has become a great friend and mentor. And while I have a lot to learn about fundraising, the list of individual supporters continues to grow. Every donation is like a vote of confidence that brightens my day. Office & Employees– CityScience moved into its first office in October. We are walking distance from Grand Central Station, and I hope all of you have a chance to visit us soon. Our expert instructors and teacher coaches deliver top notch programs and I look forward to continuing to develop our staff and pool of talented contractors. Curriculum & Science Equipment – The curriculum CityScience inherited from the Center for the Urban Environment (CUE) includes fifty subjects and well over two-hundred lesson plans that get students outside to learn science. Developed and time tested for thirty years in New York’s schools, parks and after-school programs, these programs made CUE the largest environmental educator in the five boroughs before it closed in 2009. While it was a capital project that sank CUE, the programs are exemplar and it is an honor to be chosen to carry them on.

I've been reading Steven Johnson's new book, Where Good Ideas Come From: The Natural History of Innovation. It's an enjoyable read, in large part because of Steven's ability to draw connections across seemingly unrelated subject areas to tell a unified story. I'm only about halfway through, but in a nutshell: innovation is a natural phenomenon; the basic patterns are the same whether we're talking about coral reef ecosystems, the human brain, urban systems, or technology development. Each chapter draws from examples across biology, psychology, sociology and technology to tell the story. (This approach isn't new for Johnson - one of his prior books, Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software, tells the story of bottom-up organizing by looking at examples from biology, neurology, urbanism and technology.) There is a chapter in Good Ideas about the "slow hunch": an idea that builds over time, in pieces, often without the explicit awareness of the builder. Part of what makes a slow hunch possible is the cataloging of notes and observations over time, and the ability to look back and draw associations. Many prominent thinkers (Locke, Darwin), accomplished this by keeping a "commonplace book" -- a journal of quotes, observations, sketches, and half-baked ideas -- that they would review regularly. According to Johnson, as important as writing down the notes is re-reading them, in order to make connections that you otherwise might miss:
"Each rereading of the commonplace book becomes a new kind of revelation. You see the evolutionary paths of all your past hunches: the ones that turned out to be red herrings; the ones that turned out to be too obvious to write; even the ones that turned into entire books. But each encounter holds the promise that some long-forgotten hunch will connect in a new way with some emerging obsession."
Later, Johnson talks about his own digital commonplace book, a tool called DEVONthink:
"I keep all these quotes in a database using a program called DEVONthink, where I also store my own writing: chapters, essays, blog posts, notes. By combining my own words with passages from other sources, the collection becomes something more than just a files storage system. It becomes a digital extension of my imperfect memory, an archive of all my old ideas, and the ideas that have influenced me. There are now more than five thousand distinct entries in that database, and more than 3 million words -- sixty books' worth of quotes, fragments, and hunches, all individually captured by me, stored in a single database. Having all that information available at my fingertips is not just a quantitative matter of finding my notes faster. Yes, when I'm trying to track down an article I wrote many years ago, it's now much easier to retrieve. But the qualitative change lies elsewhere: in finding documents that I've forgotten about altogether, finding documents that I didn't know I was looking for. What makes the system truly powerful is the way it fosters private serendipity."
Steven's writing is an example of this in action -- it seems clear now that this system helps him make connections he might have otherwise missed. For example:
"This can create almost lyrical connections between ideas. Several years ago, I was working on a book about cholera in London and queried DEVONthink for information about Victorian sewage systems. Because the software had detected that the word "waste" is often used alongside "sewage," it directed me to a quote that explained the way bones evolved in vertebrate bodies: namely, by repurposing the calcum waste products created by the metabolism of cells. At first glance that might seems like an errant result, but it sent me off on a long and fruitful tangent into the way complex systems -- whether cities or bodies -- find productive uses for the waste they create. That idea became a central organizing theme for one of the chapters in the cholera book."
So: it appears that re-reading your old notes, and ideally doing so with some amount of fuzz and randomization, can lead to the development of new ideas. I like it. I certainly spend a lot of time capturing notes, but my process for reviewing them is scattershot: I'll read back through old tweets & tumbls, occasionally search through my delicious bookmarks (though not that often), and sometimes scan an old notebook, but I don't have a good way of tying it all together. But, unlike Steven, I don't keep all of my notes in a single database. I use the web, and my notes are everywhere -- in blog posts I've written, tweets I've sent, bookmarks I've tagged, comments I've left, and (increasingly) in my Tumblog. I do it this way because there is value in building these ideas together with others -- I want people to read my tweets, tumbls, blog posts, and bookmarks, and connect them with their own. I could just as easily keep all of these tidbits locked up on my computer, but I believe that there's more value in opening them up. So, tools like DEVONthink (and Evernote), that assume you are using their system in isolation, aren't much help for me. I do keep private notes, but those aren't in a single system either -- they're scattered across the internet and my computer. I have hundreds of notes in Notational Velocity (a SimpleNote client for Mac -- before that I used Yojimbo for the same purpose), and I keep a journal in the form of a private wordpress blog (which serves the same purpose as OhLife would), and I have other notes in google docs and etherpads. So, what I want is a tool that helps me review across all of these sources, brings them together in a nice way, makes searching easy, and allows for some amount of fuzziness and random discovery. Basically an "open" commonplace book that understands my distributed landscape of knowledge bits. A commonplace book that works like the web. My ideal version of this tool would run locally on my computer, mostly so that it could access local files, and also for speed. The idea is something like this:

I could imagine an advanced searching interface, but for day-to-day, I'd really just want something simple and fast that integrates into my workflow (the way that Quicksilver does) without feeling like a big heavy app. There are certainly neighboring precedents in this general area of tools that organize my web-based presence. Some of my favorites are TripIt (on the left, below) which takes my travel info and repackages it in a way that's useful to me, and Momento (on the right), which takes a a bag of feeds and turns it into a nice timeline view:
Momento is maybe the closest to what I'm talking about, in that it understands that my experience is distributed, and that it's value is tying it together for me. It's serving a different purpose than the one I'm talking about, but it is in the right family. I could easily see Evernote moving in this direction, and I would be psyched if they did, but I think it would be a lighter lift to just start with simple aggregating and searching, and not worry about all of the content capture that Evernote handles. So, that's the idea. After all this, I would be pleasantly surprised to see that this already exists, but if I does, I haven't seen it yet.

I'd like to make an addition to my internet wish list for 2011: a Strategic Networking Tool. Here's what I mean: Online networks of all kinds are very good at telling you who you're already connected with. Who your friends are, who your professional contacts are, etc. This is great, but it's all looking in the rear-view mirror. What they are not yet that good for is looking forward -- helping me figure out who I should be connected with. Now, I can hear you saying "what about Twitter and Facebook's 'recommended friend' features?" Fair enough. Recently, both networks have started approaching this problem. Facebook suggests people you might be friends with; Twitter shows you related potential follows and people you are similar to.

This is a start, but so far at least, these approaches deliver new connections to me through serendipity -- "them: you might also like to meet ____; me: neat!". What I want is a tool that allows me to be more strategic with my network planning -- to see a gap and proactively work to fill it. This is particularly true when thinking from a professional / organizational perspective, rather than a personal one (though it clearly also applies to personal connections, but feels icker to me in that context). When building and growing an organization, I want to be able to look at our current network, and overlay that on our potential network. The ideal result being that I can quickly identify areas where I should invest in developing our network further. Here's a use case that exemplifies the problem: say (this is a real stretch) that I am starting up an exciting new nonprofit organization. I am going about my business, raising money, developing partnerships, hiring, etc. I am feeling pretty smart about it all -- I know my stuff and I've got a handle on things. Then, at a cocktail party, someone says "Oh, cool idea! Do you know about ______? I think they do pretty much the same thing you do." Shit. All of a sudden I feel like I haven't done my homework. Or, at the same cocktail party, someone says "Neat idea! I think ______ Foundation just gave a grant to ______ for something similar." Double shit. Exposed again as an uninformed shlub. Now, you might say: it's just part of your job to do the research and build your understanding of the space you're operating in. That is absolutely correct. What I'm asking for are some tools to help with the job. My ideal tool would:
Use available network data to build a view of our "potential network". Data sources could include: our twitter follows / followers and their networks, LinkedIn data showing connections around us (explicit linkages and also implicit ones such as common past employers, etc.), data from any existing CRM tool we use, or our email contacts, etc. etc.
Understand the different kind of relationships we might have with other people or organizations (partner, competitor, funder, etc.)
Let us tweak the network parameters to fit our preferences -- e.g., "more cowbell".
The resulting visualization would help us understand our "blind spots", and then give us suggestions for how to close the gaps. It might look something like this:
Does something like this already exist? Maybe fundraising tools like Raiser's Edge so something similar? I am sure the folks at LinkedIn have something like this cooking (in fact, when I mentioned the idea to someone from LinkedIn this summer they confirmed that they did). If it's out there, I haven't seen it yet. But boy, would I like to have it. And I'd definitely pay for it. [update 11/23/10: changed title from "Networks of Potential" to "Strategic Networking Tool"]
This is a start, but so far at least, these approaches deliver new connections to me through serendipity -- "them: you might also like to meet ____; me: neat!". What I want is a tool that allows me to be more strategic with my network planning -- to see a gap and proactively work to fill it. This is particularly true when thinking from a professional / organizational perspective, rather than a personal one (though it clearly also applies to personal connections, but feels icker to me in that context). When building and growing an organization, I want to be able to look at our current network, and overlay that on our potential network. The ideal result being that I can quickly identify areas where I should invest in developing our network further. Here's a use case that exemplifies the problem: say (this is a real stretch) that I am starting up an exciting new nonprofit organization. I am going about my business, raising money, developing partnerships, hiring, etc. I am feeling pretty smart about it all -- I know my stuff and I've got a handle on things. Then, at a cocktail party, someone says "Oh, cool idea! Do you know about ______? I think they do pretty much the same thing you do." Shit. All of a sudden I feel like I haven't done my homework. Or, at the same cocktail party, someone says "Neat idea! I think ______ Foundation just gave a grant to ______ for something similar." Double shit. Exposed again as an uninformed shlub. Now, you might say: it's just part of your job to do the research and build your understanding of the space you're operating in. That is absolutely correct. What I'm asking for are some tools to help with the job. My ideal tool would:
Use available network data to build a view of our "potential network". Data sources could include: our twitter follows / followers and their networks, LinkedIn data showing connections around us (explicit linkages and also implicit ones such as common past employers, etc.), data from any existing CRM tool we use, or our email contacts, etc. etc.
Understand the different kind of relationships we might have with other people or organizations (partner, competitor, funder, etc.)
Let us tweak the network parameters to fit our preferences -- e.g., "more cowbell".
The resulting visualization would help us understand our "blind spots", and then give us suggestions for how to close the gaps. It might look something like this:
Does something like this already exist? Maybe fundraising tools like Raiser's Edge so something similar? I am sure the folks at LinkedIn have something like this cooking (in fact, when I mentioned the idea to someone from LinkedIn this summer they confirmed that they did). If it's out there, I haven't seen it yet. But boy, would I like to have it. And I'd definitely pay for it. [update 11/23/10: changed title from "Networks of Potential" to "Strategic Networking Tool"]
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog